Gene

FDA Halts Sarepta Therapeutics’ AAVrh74 based Gene Therapy Trials after Third Death from Liver Failure

19 July 2025

Category: Drug Safety Alert / Gene Therapy Safety Update

Written by: Pharmacally Medical News Desk

Gene

Sarepta Therapeutics has been developing investigational gene therapies based on AAVrh74 vector technology for several forms of muscular dystrophy. One such therapy, SRP-9004, is being tested for limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD), while another product, Elevidys (SRP-9001), is already approved under an accelerated pathway for certain patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Both therapies use the same AAVrh74 platform to deliver genetic material to muscle tissue.

On July 18, 2025, Sarepta reported that a third patient died due to acute liver failure, and the first from the ongoing clinical trial for its limb-girdle muscular dystrophy. The patient, a 51-year-old adult with LGMD, was enrolled in a Phase 1 study and received SRP-9004 approximately 80 days before the fatal event. According to Sarepta, the patient was non-ambulatory and had pre-existing comorbidities, but the direct cause of death was liver failure, raising serious concerns about the safety of the gene therapy.

This is the third reported death related to Sarepta’s AAVrh74-based gene therapies in recent months. The first two cases involved non-ambulatory teenage patients with DMD who had received Elevidys. Both patients also died from acute liver failure, one in March and the second in June this year, prompting Sarepta earlier to pause dosing in non-ambulatory patients and apply additional monitoring strategies for liver function.

Sarepta stated it had been monitoring all patients closely and was working with experts to investigate the cause of liver injury. They disclosed the third death only after it occurred, and this comes shortly after announcing internal changes, including restructuring and reduced investment in their LGMD program. While Sarepta claimed the patient had pre-existing conditions, the repeated nature of liver injury across different studies using the same AAVrh74 vector raised red flags.

FDA’s Actions and Instructions

In immediate response to the third fatality, the U.S. FDA has taken decisive action, effective July 18, 2025. The agency has

  • Placed all Sarepta AAVrh74 therapeutic clinical trials, including the LGMD study, on full clinical hold.
  • Requested (informally) that Sarepta voluntarily suspend all shipments of Elevidys, even though the latest death was not in an Elevidys‑treated patient
  • Revoked the company’s AAVrh74 platform technology designation, citing insufficient evidence to ensure safe, multi‑indication use of the platform

FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary emphasized quick action to protect patient safety, stating the risks now outweigh the benefits, particularly for non‑ambulatory patients.

Dr. Vinay Prasad, head of CBER, confirmed the trials were halted due to “unreasonable and significant risk of illness or injury.”

Now Where Sarepta Stands:

Sarepta has paused use of Elevidys in non-ambulatory patients earlier after the second death only, but they resisted full suspension of Elevidys shipments and continue to make it available for ambulatory patients under existing approvals. The company is in discussions with the FDA to update safety labels and may introduce a black‑box warning for liver toxicity and new liver monitoring protocols, such as the use of immunosuppressive agents like sirolimus. Further patient enrollment across AAVrh74 studies is currently halted.

Summary and Implications

Three patients have now died of acute liver failure linked to Sarepta’s AAVrh74 gene therapies: two Elevidys DMD patients (teenagers, non-ambulatory) and one SRP‑9004 LGMD patient (adult).

FDA actions (July 18, 2025): clinical holds on LGMD trials, platform designation revoked, and shipment suspension request for Elevidys.

Sarepta’s stance: continues Elevidys for ambulatory DMD patients, pauses non-ambulatory shipments, and plans updated label and mitigation measures.

Implications

Safety of therapies based on AAVrh74 vector technology in nonambulatory patients is now clearly established.

Ongoing risk investigations may extend to ambulatory DMD patients.

Regulatory approval prospects for future AAVrh74-based therapies are critically impaired.

Closing Remark

This third death due to acute liver failure following use of Sarepta’s AAVrh74-based gene therapies signals a serious safety concern. While gene therapies hold promise, repeated adverse events with fatal outcomes call for extreme caution, especially in vulnerable populations like non-ambulatory patients. Regulatory agencies and companies must prioritize transparent reporting, patient safety, and re-evaluation of risk, particularly when using viral vectors like AAV that may trigger immune-mediated liver injury. Until safety concerns are fully addressed, further clinical use of AAVrh74-based gene therapies remains on hold.

References

FDA Investigating Deaths Due to Acute Liver Failure Following Treatment with Sarepta’s AAVrh74 Gene Therapies, US Food and Drug Administration, 18 July 2025, https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/fda-investigating-deaths-due-acute-liver-failure-following-treatment-sareptas-aavrh74-gene-therapies/

FDA Suspends Sarepta’s Gene Therapy Trials after Deaths; But Company Declines ELEVIDYS Shipment Halt, Nasdaq, July 19 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/fda-suspends-sareptas-gene-therapy-trials-after-deaths-company-declines-elevidys-shipment/

 Elvidys Update: Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, 18 July 2025, https://www.parentprojectmd.org/elevidys-update/

FDA Shuts Down Sarepta’s Distribution of Gene Therapy Elevidys Following Patient Deaths, Neurology Live, 18 July 2025, https://www.neurologylive.com/view/third-patient-death-leads-significant-concerns-sarepta-gene-therapy-program?utm_source=chatgpt.com

ChatGPT Image Jul 20, 2025, 02_01_12 PM

“Repurposing Fenbendazole in Oncology: Hype vs. Hope in the Context of the ‘Joe Tippens Protocol'”

20 July 2025

Category: Drug Repurposing & Experimental Therapies I

Oncology Trends & Public Perception

Medically Reviewed By: Dr. Htet Wai Moe (MBBS, MD-Pharmacology, PhD-Pharmacology)

Defence Services Medical Research Centre, Naypyitaw, Myanmar

Fenbendazole is a benzimidazole-class drug from the anthelmintic group, developed in the 1970s by the company Hoechst AG, now part of the Merck Group. It was initially created to treat parasitic worm infections in animals. Its mechanism involves the disruption of microtubule formation by binding to tubulin, a protein essential for cell division in parasites. Generally, it is considered safe for use in animals, even with long-term administration, and is approved by many regulatory bodies as a veterinary medicine. However, its use in humans is not approved in any country. Some researchers have explored its mechanism of disrupting microtubule formation to investigate its potential anticancer effects in animal studies, and to some extent, it has shown anticancer properties, but no clinical trial has confirmed this claim.

Around 2016, the survival story of an American cancer patient sparked a debate over whether Fenbendazole could completely cure any type of cancer. To support his claim, he shared a unique regimen that included Fenbendazole, which he had taken alongside his chemotherapy. This regimen went viral on the internet and became widely recognized as the “Joe Tippens Protocol.” Many cancer patients, especially those who had given up on standard treatment options, began following this protocol. However, the FDA, EMA, and the American Cancer Society have warned patients against using this approach, citing the lack of clinical trial data, unknown long-term side effects, and the risk of delaying proven standard cancer therapies.

What is the Joe Tippens Protocol?

Joe Tippens is an American cancer patient who was diagnosed with small cell lung cancer in 2016, a very aggressive form of cancer that had already metastasized to other organs like the bones and brain. His doctor gave him a grim prognosis, with just three months to live. While his standard chemotherapy was ongoing, Joe came across a research study from Oklahoma State University that involved Fenbendazole. The study was conducted on mice with glioblastoma, and Fenbendazole had shown anti-cancer activity in the lab. Adding to this hope, he also learned about a veterinarian who had used Fenbendazole to treat her cancer successfully. Encouraged by these anecdotal cases, Joe Tippens decided to add Fenbendazole to his standard treatment plan and created a combination regimen of Fenbendazole, vitamins, and natural medicine on his own. This combination of drugs and supplements later became popularized as the ‘Joe Tippens Protocol.’ As per anecdotal reports, such as those popularized by Joe Tippens, describe the use of Fenbendazole combined with various dietary supplements in his so-called Joe Tippens protocol. After three months of following this regimen, Joe Tippens claimed that his PET scan showed no evidence of cancer and that he was completely cancer-free. Interestingly, Joe Tippens was also a participant in a clinical trial for a novel anti-cancer drug at the time he used Fenbendazole, and he was reportedly the only patient out of 1,100 participants who was cured of cancer.

What Exactly Is the Mechanism of Action of Fenbendazole?

Fenbendazole, also known by its chemical name methyl N-(6-phenylsulfanyl-1H-benzimidazole-2-yl), is a benzimidazole anthelmintic primarily used to treat parasitic worm infections in animals. Fenbendazole is thought to act via disruption of microtubule function, which is essential for cell division and intracellular transport. Fenbendazole selectively binds to β-tubulin, a structural protein needed to form microtubules, and prevents the polymerization of microtubules. This disrupts the mitotic spindle, inhibiting cell division during metaphase. In parasites, this microtubule disruption also affects glucose uptake and intracellular transport, leading to energy depletion. As a result, the parasite is unable to generate ATP and dies due to starvation.

Some researchers believed that cancer cells, like parasites, heavily rely on microtubules for rapid division. By disrupting tubulin function, Fenbendazole may inhibit cancer cell proliferation, induce apoptosis (programmed cell death), and interfere with angiogenesis (formation of blood vessels in tumors). However, these effects are only observed in preclinical settings, and no human trials have been performed to verify this action.

Evidence from Preclinical Studies

Fenbendazole is extensively studied in preclinical studies on various cancer types. Preclinical results have shown mixed results, some promising tumor suppression (e.g., cervical cancer, NSCLC), but also failures in certain models (lymphoma, ovarian cancer unless bioavailability is improved). Bioavailability is found to be a consistent limitation. The preclinical study results are presented below in tabular form:

Animal Model/Cell lines

Journal/Year

Outcome

Mouse lymphoma (syngeneic)

Curr. Issue Mol Bio 2023

 

No tumor suppression, possible immune disruption

Cervical cancer (HeLa xenograft)

MDPI – Molecules (2025)

potent suppression of xenograft tumor growth, 100% survival in Fenbendazole-treated mice

NSCLC (A549 xenograft)

Scientific Reports (2018)

Fenbendazole treatment caused a partial alteration of the microtubule network

Liver cancer (H4IIE cells)

Biol. Pharm. Bull. (2022)

Cell cycle arrest, selective apoptosis

Ovarian cancer (in vivo)

PMC Article (2023)

Decreased cell proliferation in EOC cell line; in cell line xenograft mouse models, no effect on oral administration

Micelle formulation

Pharmaceutics (2020)

Improved bioavailability, No Severe toxicity

Evidence from Off-Label Fenbendazole Use in Human Case Studies

As of now, no controlled clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the safety or efficacy of Fenbendazole in cancer patients, and robust clinical data are completely absent. However, a limited number of case reports and small case series have documented instances where patients self-administered Fenbendazole off-label alongside conventional or alternative therapies. While these anecdotal accounts offer insights into individual experiences. A summary of such reports is presented below in tabular form.

Case

Cancer Type

Fenbendazole Use & Co-Therapies’

Outcome

Safety

Case series (3 patients), 2025

Breast / Prostate / Melanoma

Fenbendazole + other therapies (no chemo)

Two Complete Remission (CR) achieved, one near‑CR

No adverse effects

80-year-old NSCLC patient

NSCLC

Self‑administered Fenbendazole (inspired by social media)

No tumor shrinking

Severe liver injury (resolved)

67‑yr patient with drug-induced liver injury

H/O-Colon cancer Premalignant skin lesion

Self‑administered Fenbendazole

Not specified

Severe liver injury (resolved)

Stage III rectal carcinoma

Rectal cancer

Fenbendazole + curcumin + vitamin D + CBD Oil

Tumor “scab” and lymph nodes shrank

No side effects reported

A few well-documented unusual responses (e.g., complete remissions) suggest that Fenbendazole could have biological activity in some contexts, but considering it as evidence is questionable. In any case, none of the reports include controlled conditions or comparable cohorts, and most involve concomitant therapies. No randomized or phase I–II trials exist to establish safety, dosing, or effectiveness.

Limitations of the use of Fenbendazole as an anticancer

  • Absence of clinical trial data
  • Drug interactions and potential toxicity, like severe liver injury
  • Issues with sourcing veterinary drugs for human use (No FDA or EMA approval for Human use)
  • Risk of delaying standard treatment

Possible contamination: Veterinary formulations are not subject to the same rigorous manufacturing standards as human medicines and may contain impurities, variable dosing, or excipients unsuitable for human consumption. Potential contamination further limits their applicability.

Pharmacokinetic concerns: Another significant concern of considering Fenbendazole is its poor oral bioavailability. Fenbendazole is developed for veterinary use, and it is never optimized for absorption in humans.

Conclusion

Fenbendazole is a humble veterinary anthelmintic drug that has suddenly come into the limelight as a potential treatment for cancer, mainly due to some anecdotal reports that surfaced among them. one of which was the Joe Tippens Protocol. Joe Tippens’s story on social media sparked a debate, and desperate cancer patients didn’t take a second thought before trying this veterinary product. However, while some might have benefitted, many have experienced serious side effects with no efficacy. Those who did benefit from Fenbendazole still have questionable causality, as they were also on standard therapy.

Another reason for Fenbendazole’s association with anticancer effects is its mechanism of action. Fenbendazole has demonstrated probable anticancer activity in preclinical settings through microtubule destabilization, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis induction, along with selective cytotoxicity in proliferating cancer cells. Several animal studies and in vitro models have supported its tumor-suppressive potential, specifically in lung and cervical cancer models.

However, preclinical studies have not yet extended to clinical studies. No controlled human trials have been conducted, and the current knowledge about Fenbendazole’s anticancer effects is limited to some case reports and anecdotal experiences, many of which are complicated by concurrent standard therapies and a lack of robust clinical validation. Moreover, serious pharmacokinetic challenges, such as low oral bioavailability, further weaken its potential as a reliable human therapy in its current form.

In summary, while Fenbendazole presents itself as an interesting case for drug repurposing, the current evidence is insufficient, inconsistent, and mainly anecdotal. As of now, Fenbendazole remains a molecule of curiosity rather than clinical conviction. Until high-quality human trials are conducted to clarify its safety, dosing, and efficacy, Fenbendazole should not be considered a substitute for evidence-based cancer therapies.

Given its mechanism of action targeting cell division, which is fundamental to cancer progression, and the emergence of anecdotal reports, Fenbendazole has attracted some scientific curiosity. However, it remains an experimental drug with no evidence of efficacy in humans. In the absence of robust clinical trials, validated formulations, a defined safety profile, and regulatory approval, its use in cancer treatment should be approached with caution or avoided. At this stage, Fenbendazole represents a subject of investigation rather than a validated therapeutic option.

References

Blog of Joe Tippen, Updated 24 March 2022, https://mycancerstory.rocks/the-blog/

Dogra N, Madan E, Dey KK, Kundu R, Kumar M, Basu A, et al. Fenbendazole acts as a moderate microtubule destabilizing agent and causes cancer cell death by modulating multiple cellular pathways. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30158-6

Nguyen J, Nguyen TQ, Han B, Hoang BX. Oral Fenbendazole for cancer therapy in humans and animals. Anticancer Res. 2024; 44:3725–35. doi:10.21873/anticanres.17197.

William Makis, Ilyes Baghli, Pierrick Martinez; Fenbendazole as an Anticancer Agent? A Case Series of Self-Administration in Three Patients. Case Rep Oncol1 January 2025; 18 (1): 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1159/000546362

Yamaguchi T, Shimizu J, Oya Y, Horio Y, Hida T. Drug-Induced Liver Injury in a Patient with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer after the Self-Administration of Fenbendazole Based on Social Media Information. Case Rep Oncol. 2021 Jun 17;14(2):886-891. Doi: 10.1159/000516276. PMID: 34248555; PMCID: PMC8255718.

Case Report: Rectal Carcinoma Stage 3, Male, Aged 72, Fenbendazole.org, https://www.Fenbendazole.org/rectal-carcinoma-stage-3/

Lei, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Duan, J.; Gao, X.; Cong, Z. Fenbendazole Exhibits Antitumor Activity Against Cervical Cancer Through Dual Targeting of Cancer Cells and Cancer Stem Cells: Evidence from In Vitro and In Vivo Models. Molecules202530, 2377. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30112377

Jung H, Kim SY, Joo HG. Fenbendazole Exhibits Differential Anticancer Effects In Vitro and In Vivo in Models of Mouse Lymphoma. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023 Nov 8; 45(11):8925-8938. Doi: 10.3390/cimb45110560. PMID: 37998737; PMCID: PMC10670425.

Park D. Fenbendazole Suppresses Growth and Induces Apoptosis of Actively Growing H4IIE Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells via p21-Mediated Cell-Cycle Arrest. Biol Pharm Bull. 2022; 45(2):184-193. Doi: 10.1248/bpb.b21-00697. PMID: 35110505.

Chang CS, Ryu JY, Choi JK, Cho YJ, Choi JJ, Hwang JR, Choi JY, Noh JJ, Lee CM, Won JE, Han HD, Lee JW. Anti-cancer effect of Fenbendazole-incorporated PLGA nanoparticles in ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Sep; 34(5):e58. Doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e58. Epub 2023 Apr 24. PMID: 37170725; PMCID: PMC10482585.

Jin IS, Jo MJ, Park CW, Chung YB, Kim JS, Shin DH. Physicochemical, Pharmacokinetic, and Toxicity Evaluation of Soluplus® Polymeric Micelles Encapsulating Fenbendazole. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Oct 21; 12(10):1000. Doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12101000. PMID: 33096915; PMCID: PMC7589096.

 

18924

“FDA raises Ocular Toxicity Concerns over GSK’s Blenrep (Belantamab Mafodotin): A Setback for Multiple Myeloma Hope”

17 July 2025

Article updated on 17 July 2025 after ODAC meeting

Category: Drug Safety & Regulatory Affairs I Adverse Events & Warnings I

Oncology Drug Safety

Written by: Pharmacally Medical News Desk

18924

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has raised concerns over the safety profile of GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK) Blenrep (belantamab mafodotin), presenting in a briefing document to the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) ahead of the July 17, 2025, meeting. In a briefing document, the FDA has stressed persistent and severe ocular toxicities in patients treated with the drug for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This disclosure creates doubt on the long-term practicability of Blenrep’s proposed dosages despite encouraging efficacy results in DREAMM clinical trials.

History of Blenrep

Blenrep was originally granted accelerated approval in 2020, and it was positioned as a breakthrough antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). Its approval was based on early efficacy signals in heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients. However, it was withdrawn from the U.S. market in 2023 following the failure of its confirmatory DREAMM-3 trial to meet the primary progression-free survival (PFS) endpoint. The monotherapy dosage of belantamab mafodotin was 2.5 mg/kg IV once every 3 weeks.

Despite this setback, GSK returned with new data from two pivotal Phase 3 trials, DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8, evaluating Blenrep in combination with standard multiple myeloma therapies, including:

In combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients who have received at least one prior line of therapy. Dosage was 2.5 mg/kg of actual body weight IV once every 3 weeks, and

In combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients who have received at least one prior line of therapy, including lenalidomide, dosage was 2.5 mg/kg of body weight IV once on Cycle 1, followed by 1.9 mg/kg IV once every 4 weeks starting on Cycle 2

Both trials have demonstrated prominent efficacy. In DREAMM-7, the median PFS was 37 months in the Blenrep arm compared to 13 months in the control group. Similarly, in DREAMM-8, the PFS hazard ratio favored Blenrep combinations. Even though achieving these significant results, the toxicities and safety concerns overshadowed the efficacy performance.

Mechanism of Belantamab Mafodotin

Belantamab mafodotin is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that specifically targets B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), a cell surface protein highly expressed on malignant plasma cells in multiple myeloma.

The FDA’s concern over ocular toxicity is as follows:

During the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 trials, higher rates of Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) on the belantamab mafodotin-containing arm of each study have been observed. (95% and 92% patients experienced TEAE in DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 trial arms, respectively.)

The most common eye-related TEAEs with the DREAMM-7 Belantamab arm (≥20%) were blurred vision, peripheral neuropathy, dry eye, photophobia, foreign body sensation in the eye, eye irritation, and eye pain.

The most common eye-related TEAEs with the DREAMM-8 Belantamab arm were blurred vision, dry eye, foreign body sensation, eye irritation, photophobia, eye pain, cataracts, and reduced visual acuity.

Based on the Sponsor’s Keratopathy and Visual Acuity (KVA), 77% of patients treated in DREAMM-7 Belantamab arm and 78% of patients treated in DREAMM-8 Belantamab arm experienced Grade 3-4 KVA events

High rates of treatment interruptions due to KVA events (DREAMM-7 Belantamab arm 74%; DREAMM-8 Belantamab arm 75%).

The FDA noted that Ocular toxicity is a key safety concern with belantamab mafodotin as described above, and it may lead to irreversible vision loss. The FDA believed the ocular toxicity is related to nonspecific uptake of the MMAF payload into corneal epithelial cells; other factors, such as a systemic inflammatory response, may also contribute to the toxicity.

Potential Mechanism of Ocular Toxicity

Even if the BCMA (The target of belantamab) is not found in the eye, belantamab mafodotin can still enter corneal cells by a nonspecific process called macropinocytosis, leading to cell damage. Lab studies have shown that the drug’s toxic payload can harm corneal cells even at low concentrations. In animal studies, signs of eye damage included cell death, cloudiness, blood vessel growth, and retinal changes. Additionally, inflammation caused by the drug may also play a role in these eye problems.

FDA concern over dosage optimization

Apart from safety concerns, the FDA also raised questions on GSK for limited dose exploration. FDA has already warned GSK to evaluate lower or less frequent dosing schedules during initial withdrawal in 2023. Still, GSK proceeded with a dosing regimen similar to the previously withdrawn monotherapy dose of 2.5 mg/kg every three weeks in DREAMM-7 and a slightly lower frequency (1.9 mg/kg) in the DREAMM-8 trial.

However, in favor of GSK a supporting data from M Protein modelling studies and post-marketing research (DREAMM-14) suggested that efficacy might be preserved with lower doses and longer intervals, potentially reducing the toxicity burden. Nevertheless, the current submissions lacked robust evidence to confirm these lower-dose benefits.

Waiting for Regulatory Decision

The FDA’s core concern remains whether the dosages used in DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 are justified because of substantial and sometimes irreversible ocular toxicities.

However, the efficacy data are fulfilling the requirements for regulatory consideration, but the safety profile challenges the overall benefit-risk balance.

The agency has convened the ODAC not just to review the efficacy of Blenrep but on purpose came in to highlight the point of whether a truly optimized and tolerable dosing regimen has been established.

Update from ODAC meeting

The ODAC meeting that concluded on July 17, 2025, voted against the benefit–risk profile of GSK’s Blenrep (belantamab mafodotin) in its current combination regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

For the Blenrep + bortezomib/dexamethasone (BVd) combination, the vote was 5 against and 3 in favor.

For the Blenrep + pomalidomide/dexamethasone (BPd) regimen, the vote was 7 against, 1 in favor

ODAC’s recommendation is non-binding, but historically, the FDA tends to align with its advisory committee.

FDA reviewers and ODAC stressed the need for lower-dose studies and better strategies to mitigate eye toxicity before any approval can be considered.

The final FDA decision, previously expected around the PDUFA date of July 23, 2025, may be delayed or denied, depending on GSK’s ability to address these concerns

Conclusion

GSK’s molecule shows therapeutic promise for a challenging disease like multiple myeloma, but the ocular toxicity risks, especially in the absence of well-defined, lower-risk dosing protocols, may significantly hinder its path to full approval.

Update: The ODAC has rejected the current dosing regimens of Blenrep combinations, citing eye safety issues and insufficient dose optimization. GSK will likely need to conduct further studies—particularly on reduced dosing or enhanced risk management—before FDA approval can move forward.

References

FDA Briefing Document, BLA 761440 Drug name: Blenrep (belantamab mafodotin), Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July 17, 2025 https://www.fda.gov/media/187578/download

FDA’s ODAC Votes against Risk: Benefit Profiles of Belantamab Mafodotin Combos in R/R Myeloma, OncLive, 17 July 2025, https://www.onclive.com/view/fda-s-odac-votes-against-risk-benefit-profiles-of-belantamab-mafodotin-combos-in-r-r-myeloma

GSK provides update on US FDA advisory committee review of Blenrep (belantamab mafodotin-blmf) combinations for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, GSK, https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/gsk-provides-update-on-us-fda-advisory-committee-review-of-blenrep-belantamab-mafodotin-blmf-combinations-for-patients-with-relapsedrefractory-multiple-myeloma/

2149152754

Sun Pharma Launches LEQSELVI™ in the U.S. for Severe Alopecia Areata after Patent Settlement

16 July 2025

Category: New Drug Approval I DermatologyI

Alopecia Areata Treatment

Written By: Pharmacally Medical News Desk

2149152754

India’s Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., one of the world’s largest specialty generics pharmaceutical companies, has officially launched LEQSELVI™ (deuruxolitinib) 8 mg tablets in the United States for the treatment of severe alopecia areata. Leqselvi is a Janus kinase (JAK1/JAK2) inhibitor. is now available to U.S. adults through prescription, following an important patent litigation settlement with Incyte Corporation.

The launch marks Sun Pharma’s strategic entry into the U.S. dermatology specialty market with a much-needed treatment for an autoimmune condition that affects hair follicles and causes patchy or total hair loss.

What is LEQSELVI?

LEQSELVI (deuruxolitinib) is an oral small molecule that inhibits Janus kinase 1 and 2 (JAK1/JAK2), pathways known to be involved in the autoimmune destruction of hair follicles in alopecia areata. It is now the third FDA-approved JAK inhibitor for this condition in the U.S., joining competitors like Olumiant (baricitinib) and Litfulo (ritlecitinib).

Clinical Trial Highlights

LEQSELVI’s efficacy was demonstrated in two pivotal Phase 3 trials (THRIVE-AA1 and THRIVE-AA2) (NCT04518995 and NCT04797650) involving over 1,200 adults with ≥50% scalp hair loss. Key outcomes included:

33% of patients experienced near-complete hair regrowth by week 24.

38% and 33% of patients achieved a SALT score ≤20 with deuruxolitinib 12 mg BID and 8 mg BID, respectively, over 24 weeks of treatment

In the long-term extension study, nearly 49% of patients achieved a SALT score ≤20 (representing minimal hair loss) by week 68, with 76.6% achieving this when using observed data.

These findings underscore LEQSELVI’s potential to offer sustained, meaningful hair regrowth in patients suffering from moderate to severe alopecia areata.

Safety and Prescribing Considerations

While LEQSELVI offers hope, it comes with important safety considerations. Potential serious side effects include:

  • Increased risk of serious infections, including TB, malignancy, blood clots, and cardiovascular events.
  • Testing for latent TB before and during treatment is advisable.
  • It should be avoided in patients who are CYP2C9 poor metabolizers or are on moderate to strong CYP2C9 inhibitors.
  • Common side effects noted in trials include headache, acne, and nasopharyngitis.

Physicians are advised to conduct appropriate risk-benefit assessments before initiating therapy.

Legal & Commercial Strategy: Settlement with Incyte

The U.S. launch was made possible after Sun Pharma reached a settlement with Incyte Corporation, which had earlier filed a patent infringement lawsuit. As part of the agreement, Incyte granted Sun Pharma a non-exclusive license for non-oncology uses, including alopecia areata. Sun Pharma also agreed to pay upfront and milestone payments, along with royalties until expiration of the patents.

This resolution not only cleared the path for LEQSELVI’s commercial debut but also signaled a strategic win for Sun Pharma in the specialty drug space.

Market Impact & Access Program

Analysts estimate LEQSELVI’s market potential to reach $200–300 million over the next 3–5 years, with a peak potential of up to $900 million. Its launch boosts Sun Pharma’s growing U.S. dermatology and specialty care portfolio. Leqselvi’s US market entry builds on the 2023 acquisition of Concert Pharmaceuticals, the original developer of deuruxolitinib, for $576 million.

To support patient access, Sun Pharma introduced the LEQSELVI SUPPORT™ Program, offering:

  • Medication for as low as $0 for up to two years for eligible patients.
  • Dedicated Patient Access Liaisons to guide the treatment journey.

Key People’s Opinion

“The launch of LEQSELVI in the U.S. brings an effective, new treatment option for severe alopecia areata to eligible patients and the healthcare providers who treat them,” expressed Richard Ascroft, CEO, Sun Pharma North America.

Arash Mostaghimi, MD, MPA, MPH, FAAD, Vice Chair of Clinical Trials and Innovation and Associate Professor of Dermatology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, said, “The clinical evidence for LEQSELVI is truly compelling, demonstrating consistent efficacy.”

Conclusion

The launch of LEQSELVI marks a major milestone in the treatment of severe alopecia areata, offering a new oral option with proven efficacy and sustained results. For Sun Pharma, it represents not just a product launch but a successful foray into high-value specialty markets in the U.S., backed by smart legal navigation and strong clinical data.

As awareness and diagnosis of alopecia areata grow, especially among younger adults, LEQSELVI could soon become a cornerstone therapy offering both hopes for patients and growth for Sun Pharma.

Reference

Sun Pharma Announces Launch of LEQSELVI™ (deuruxolitinib) in the United States for the Treatment of Severe Alopecia Areata, Sun Pharma, July 14 2025, https://sunpharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/AFD_LEQSELVI-Product-Launch-Press-Release_7.14.25.pdf

Leqselvi, https://www.leqselvi.com/

Sun Pharma launches alopecia drug Leqselvi in US after settling patent dispute, mint, https://www.livemint.com/companies/sun-pharma-alopecia-drug-leqselvi-us-patent-dispute-pharmaceutical-market-deuruxolitinib-clinical-trials-11752504343463.html

Sun Pharma launches key alopecia drug in US, experts estimate $200–300 million market potential, Financial Express, July 15 2025, https://www.financialexpress.com/business/industry-sun-pharma-launches-key-alopecia-drug-in-us-experts-estimate-200300-million-market-potential-3914871/

Sun Pharma Announces Launch of LEQSELVI™ (deuruxolitinib) in the United States for the Treatment of Severe Alopecia Areata, PR Newswire, July 14 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sun-pharma-announces-launch-of-leqselvi-deuruxolitinib-in-the-united-states-for-the-treatment-of-severe-alopecia-areata-302504221.html

Results from thrive-aa2: a double blind, placebocontrolled phase 3 clinical trial of deuruxolitinib (ctp543), an oral jak inhibitor, in adult patients with moderate to severe alopecia areata, AAD Annual Meeting, New Orleans S042 Late Breaking Research Session Mar 18, 2023, https://www.biomedtracker.com/EventFiles/Concert%202023-03-18%20CTP-543%20Phase%20III%20Updated%20Results%20AAD%20Slides.pdf

King B, Senna MM, Mesinkovska NA, et al, Efficacy and safety of deuruxolitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor, in adults with alopecia areata: Results from the Phase 3 randomized, controlled trial (THRIVE-AA1). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 Nov;91(5):880-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.06.097. Epub 2024 Jul 23. PMID: 39053611.

Long-Term Results Demonstrate Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Hair Regrowth Following Oral Deuruxolitinib, Dermatology Times, 26 Oct 2024, https://www.dermatologytimes.com/view/long-term-results-demonstrate-clinically-meaningful-improvements-in-hair-regrowth-following-oral-deuruxolitinib

ChatGPT Image Jul 8, 2025, 11_56_42 PM

Novartis’s First-ever Malaria Treatment for Newborns under 5 kg- Coartem® Baby Approved by Swissmedic

08 July 2025

Category: Drug Approvals & Regulatory Updates I

Infectious Diseases – Malaria & Public Health Impact

Written By: Pharmacally Medical News Desk

ChatGPT Image Jul 9, 2025, 12_12_18 AM

In a landmark decision on July 8, 2025, Swissmedic approved Coartem® Baby (artemether-lumefantrine), also known as Riamet Baby in some countries, marking the world’s first antimalarial drug specifically formulated for infants weighing under 5 kg. This approval fills a long-standing gap in pediatric malaria care, as no evidence-based treatment regimen previously existed for this highly vulnerable population. The original Coartem formulation received its first approval in 1999; this new infant-specific dosage strength represents a major advancement in modifying malaria treatment to the needs of the youngest patients.

The CALINA Phase II/III Trial

The approval of this new formulation is based on clinical trial data conducted in babies weighing less than 5 kg. The CALINA study evaluated a novel fraction and dosage of Coartem baby (artemether-lumefantrine) in consideration of metabolic differences in infants weighing less than 5 kg.

CALINA (Clinical trial no. NCT04300309), the open-label, single-arm, multicountry Phase II/III study, enrolled infants weighing 2 kg to <5 kg with confirmed uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. The trial divided subjects into age-based cohorts: neonates (<28 days) and young infants (up to 1 year).

Participants received a new artemether‑lumefantrine ratio (5 mg/60 mg) designed specifically for infants. The regimen included a core 43-day treatment and follow‑up, along with a 12‑month neurodevelopmental assessment, ensuring both safety and developmental well-being.

The trial sites cover six malaria-endemic nations: Burkina Faso, DRC, Kenya, Mali, Nigeria, and Zambia, coordinated by Novartis, Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), and Swiss TPH under the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP2) funded PAMAfrica consortium.

The CALINA study showed that the infant-friendly dosage achieved target pharmacokinetic levels, with first-rate safety and tolerability. Cure rates imitated those seen in older children, with no new safety concerns reported. This result represents the first evidence-based dosing regimen tailored for infants under 5 kg.

Rollout under the MAGHP framework on a not-for-profit basis

The Swiss medic’s approval follows the results of the CALINA trial and the involvement of eight African regulators, who will benefit from expedited access via Switzerland’s Marketing Authorisation for Global Health Products (MAGHP) framework. This regulatory model supports rapid multi-country rollouts across malaria‑endemic regions.

Novartis promises to distribute Coartem® Baby on a not‑for‑profit basis, under a global health mandate with MAGHP coverage, ensuring no financial barrier for the most at‑risk infants.

Malaria Burden and Treatment Gap

Malaria remains a major public health threat worldwide, with around 600,000 deaths annually, with the highest burden seen in African countries and African children. Even though significant progress has been made in malaria treatment over the past few decades, very limited data are present for babies who are the most vulnerable group, weighing less than 5 kg.

Newborns can develop malaria through placental transmission before birth or by being bitten by infected mosquitoes after birth.

Currently, no malaria treatments are specifically designed or approved for infants under 5 kg. Instead, healthcare providers often use medications intended for older children, adjusting the dose by weight. This approach is risky because infants have immature liver and kidney function, which affects how their bodies process medications. As a result, they are more prone to drug-related side effects such as overdosing or toxicity.

Global Health Collaboration

The approval of Coartem® Baby is the result of a high-impact global collaboration among leading health and research organizations. Novartis played a central role by leveraging its pharmaceutical manufacturing and regulatory expertise to bring this pediatric formulation to life. The Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), a longstanding partner in antimalarial development, co-developed and funded the project alongside Novartis. The Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) led clinical investigations on the ground in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), ensuring high-quality data collection and patient monitoring. Funding support also came from EDCTP2 through the PAMAfrica Consortium, which fostered strong Africa-Europe cooperation and helped fast-track the trial.

Final Take

Coartem® Baby, backed by robust CALINA data, has secured a world-first approval for neonatal antimalarial care, setting a new standard in pediatric care. By offering the medicine at no profit and working closely with regulators, specifically with countries that are facing the most burden of the disease, this treatment meets a significant requirement and shows how focused clinical trials can improve access to care for the most vulnerable population. As the rollout progresses through African nations, this could transform infant malaria treatment and save many beautiful souls.

References

Novartis receives approval for first malaria medicine for newborn babies and young infants, July 08 2025, Novartis, https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/novartis-receives-approval-first-malaria-medicine-newborn-babies-and-young-infants

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of a New Artemether-lumefantrine Dispersible Tablet in Infants and Neonates <5 kg Body Weight With Acute Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria (CALINA), ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04300309, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04300309

Novartis and Medicines for Malaria Venture announce positive efficacy and safety data for a novel treatment for babies <5 kg with malaria, Novartis, 24 April 2024, https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/novartis-and-medicines-malaria-venture-announce-positive-efficacy-and-safety-data-novel-treatment-babies

Marketing Authorisation for Global Health Products (MAGHP), swissmedic, file:///C:/Users/admin/Downloads/Swissmedic_MAGHP_Procedure.pdf

Novartis wins approval for first malaria drug for newborns and babies, July 08 2025, https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/novartis-gets-approval-first-malaria-drug-babies-children-2025-07-08/

Malaria, World Health Organization (WHO), https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria

Liu Q, Zhang S, Wu Y, Global, regional and national burden and time trends of malaria in children and young adolescents under 15 years from 1990 to 2021: a worldwide observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 17; 25(1):548. Doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10949-9. PMID: 40247186; PMCID: PMC12004559.

Malaria, Nearly every minute, a child under 5 dies of malaria, UNICEF for every child, https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-health/malaria/

sleepreview

Can the Weight Loss Indication of Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Be Revoked in India? Understanding the Recent PIL against GLP-1 Drugs

08 July 2025

Category: Drug Safety & Regulation

Written by:

Pharmacally Medical News Desk

Source:sleepreviewmag.com

A recent Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Jitendra Chouksey, founder of FITTR, in the Delhi High Court has sparked nationwide discussion over the misuse of GLP-1 receptor agonists, notably semaglutide (Ozempic, Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Mounjaro, Zepbound), as an aesthetic weight loss agent in India. The court has now directed the Indian drug regulatory authority, the Central Drug Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), to reassess its approval, raising critical questions about drug safety, misuse, and the ethics of cosmetic pharmacology. The petition argues that these have been approved and marketed in India without robust local safety and efficacy trials and are being misused by gym-goers, wellness influencers, gyms, and clinics as a “magic formula” for aesthetic weight reduction.

The petition claims:

  • These drugs have been approved in India without robust local clinical trials.
  • There is rampant misuse of cosmetic weight loss, driven by social media and unqualified prescribers.
  • Users are being exposed to serious side effects like pancreatitis, thyroid/pancreatic cancers, cardiovascular events, and vision loss.
  • The phenomenon is driven more by body image trends than actual medical needs, raising a public health concern

Delhi High Court’s Response

On July 1–2, 2025, the Delhi High Court bench of Chief Justice Devendra K. Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela issued key directions:

  • The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) and the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) must review the PIL representation within three months, involving all stakeholders, including doctors, manufacturers, and the petitioner.
  • The court allowed the petitioner to submit additional scientific evidence within two weeks.
  • Strong remarks were made about the unauthorized promotion of these drugs by gym trainers and influencers, stating it could be a matter for criminal investigation.
  • Observed that if regulatory bodies fail to act, the court may entertain another PIL on similar grounds (a liberty granted to the petitioner)

Why Is This Significant for India?

India is witnessing a surge in aesthetic- and fitness-focused drug use, especially among urban youth. While GLP-1 RA drugs are proven effective for managing obesity in specific populations (e.g., those with diabetes or severe obesity), their off-label use for cosmetic slimming poses several challenges:

  • Indian experts say that genetic, dietary, and lifestyle differences could lead to different side‑effect profiles in Indian patients, warranting specific trials.
  • No Indian-specific safety data exists yet for long-term use in non-diabetic individuals.
  • The drug retail system lacks strict control, leading to unsupervised access.
  • The Indian market is highly price-sensitive, and cheaper versions or black-market imports could aggravate misuse.
  • The trend is amplified by social media influencers, leading to the normalization of injectable “slimming shots” among teenagers and young adults.

Furthermore, India has previously banned irrational drug combinations lacking local trial data. This PIL could establish a model for evaluating imported drug approvals through an Indian regulatory lens, balancing public demand with safety.

Next steps & possible outcomes

Review by DCGI/CDSCO
Within three months, they must evaluate:

  • Whether local trials and safety data justify the drugs’ weight-loss approvals
  • If marketing is overly permissive or misleading
  • Whether stricter controls, a contraindication for non-diabetics, brand-label rewriting, or pharmacovigilance systems are needed

Potential outcomes

  • Approvals may be maintained with added safeguards.
  • Labeling could be tightened, restricting use to diabetics or those with morbid obesity under supervision.
  • Non-diabetic use might be revoked or suspended, pending new trials.
  • Enforcement actions may be directed against gyms/clinics illegally prescribing or administering them.

Further legal action

If the government/regulators fail to act satisfactorily, the petitioner can file another PIL to compel stricter measures or revocation.

Summary

The PIL is a major challenge to the current GLP-1 RA drug approval, allowing them to be used for weight loss, raising critical issues such as off-label usage, aesthetic-driven misuse, lack of India-specific safety data, and commercialization without adequate oversight. The Delhi High Court’s directive to the CDSCO/DCGI to act by early October 2025 will be a crucial moment. Their decision, ranging from maintaining the status quo with safety warnings and limiting to prescription-only access, to revoking the weight-loss indication, could significantly shape the future of anti-obesity drug regulation in India.

References

Delhi HC seeks regulator’s reply after PIL questions Ozempic, Mounjaro nod, The Economic Times, 03 July 2025, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/pharmaceuticals/delhi-hc-seeks-regulators-reply-after-pil-questions-ozempic-mounjaro-nod/articleshow/122211529.cms?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Decide within 3 months’: Delhi HC tells CDSCO on plea against use of diabetes drugs in weight management, The Healthy Indian Project (THIP), 02 July 2025, https://www.thip.media/news/decide-within-3-months-delhi-hc-tells-cdsco-on-plea-against-use-of-diabetes-drugs-in-weight-management/120177/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Delhi HC ‘alarm’ over misuse of diabetes drug for weight loss, News Arena India, 03 July 2025, https://newsarenaindia.com/nation/delhi-hc-alarm-over-misuse-of-diabetes-drug-for-weight-loss/49182?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

 

ChatGPT Image Jul 7, 2025, 01_46_40 PM

Look Alike & Sound Alike Medicines: An Emerging Challenge in Patient Safety

07 July 2025

Category: Patient Safety Initiatives I

Clinical Practice & Prescribing Safety I

Medication Safety

Written By: Dr. Srivatsan Suresh (PharmD)

ChatGPT Image Jul 7, 2025, 01_46_40 PM

Around the world, Look Alike & Sound Alike drugs (LASA) are a known source of preventable medication errors. When medications with similar names, packaging, or articulation are mistakenly prescribed, dispensed, or administered, these mistakes happen. The results include life-threatening adverse events or therapeutic failure.

Despite increased use of digital technologies, LASA-related events remain common. A 2021 systematic review reported that medication name confusion is still a major contributor to wrong-drug errors globally. Reducing LASA errors requires system-wide vigilance, training, and safety design in addition to improved labeling.

Case Report Highlights

Tanzania (2024)

In a documented case from Tanzania, a 37-year-old woman undergoing cesarean delivery received tranexamic acid (TXA) intrathecally instead of bupivacaine. It is because the ampoules look similar and are stored in the same surgical drug tray. So within 21 hours, the patient experienced a seizure, severe autonomic disturbances,, and death.

Egypt (2023)

Another case from Egypt involved a 31-year-old male who received 400 mg of TXA intrathecally during surgery. Unlike most such cases, he survived after performing Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lavage and ICU care. This highlights the urgent need for redesigning ampoules with distinct visuals.

USA
In multiple U.S. hospitals, Hydroxyzine (an antihistamine) was mistakenly given in place of Hydralazine (an antihypertensive). Both drugs were often stored next to each other in ADCs (automated dispensing cabinets). This prompted the ISMP to recommend separate storage, TallMan lettering, and barcode verification protocols for high-alert LASA medications.

Canada

The Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada (ISMP Canada) has documented four separate incidents in which lamotrigine (LAMICTAL) was confused with three entirely different medications. In these cases, patients were inadvertently dispensed

Lamivudine (HEPTOVIR), is an antiretroviral agent, Terbinafine HCl (LAMISIL) is an antifungal, and Liothyronine (CYTOMEL) is a thyroid hormone replacement

Each mix-up arises from striking similarities in drug names or packaging, resulting in potentially serious clinical consequences. These reports underscore the imperative for heightened pharmacy verification steps such as Tall Man lettering, barcode scanning, and double‑check systems to catch LASA errors before they reach the patient.

Indian Generic Market as a potential source

The Indian generic pharmaceutical market has inadvertently become a significant source of Look-Alike Sound-Alike (LASA) medication errors. With thousands of manufacturers producing similar formulations under distinct brand names, the risk of phonetic and orthographic confusion is significant. Many generic brands adopt names that closely resemble existing products in an attempt to gain market traction, most of the time without adequate regulatory screening for name uniqueness. This leads to confusion at the prescribing, dispensing, and administration stages, particularly in resource-limited settings where electronic verification tools may be lacking.

Global Trends

According to a 2023 Australian study, LASA drug mix-ups, particularly involving injectables like TXA, dopamine, and local anesthetics, were responsible for 6-15% of preoperative incidents. The study recommended segregated storage procedures and clearer ampoule labeling.

The Lancet (2024) suggested regulatory reform and standardized drug labeling in India. Due to the pharmaceutical industry’s widespread fragmentation, local brands with phonetically similar names were frequently confused, particularly in settings involving oncology and anesthesia.

Tall Man lettering and brand screening should be implemented nationwide immediately after researchers in Thailand examined more than 18,000 brand names and discovered frequent orthographic and phonetic overlaps among commonly prescribed drugs.

Technology-Driven Innovations

AI-Based Pill Recognition

 A 2022 AI model, PIMA (Pill Identification via Matching Algorithm), used deep learning and contrastive learning to match pill images to prescriptions. It improved correct identification rates from 19% (human-only review) to 47% using machine learning.

Automated Dispensing Cabinets (ADC)

 Selection errors are greatly decreased by modern ADCs when they are set up with barcode scanning and optimal LASA drug placement. According to a 2021 ISMP bulletin, 12% of LASA near-misses were caused by improper cabinet layouts

System Factors behind LASA Errors

A medication error rarely happens due to oversight. The Swiss Cheese Model explains that layers of system failures—like poor labeling, fatigue, or sound-alike names align to allow such errors through.

Some key contributing factors are

  • Similar packaging or ampoule colour
  • Inadequate barcode scanning
  • Distractions or rushed environments
  • Lack of Tall Man Lettering
  • Verbal miscommunication or illegible prescriptions

In busy surgical or emergency settings, these issues compound and lead to fatal outcomes.

Prevention Strategies

Tall Man Lettering

Used to highlight differences in similar drug names (eg- vincristine vs. vinblastine), this has been endorsed by the FDA and implemented in many EMR systems.

Barcode and Scanning

Incorporating barcode technology for verification during dispensing and administration reduces manual selection errors significantly.

AI verification tools

Machine learning models like PIMA and image-matching algorithms are being piloted to verify pills, especially in outpatient or home care settings.

Physical separation of LASA drugs

LASA-prone medications need to be kept physically apart, particularly in intensive care units, emergency rooms, and operating rooms.

Standardized protocols and training

  • Verifying twice while preparing and administering
  • Regular training includes LASA case studies
  • Simulation studies are required when approving new drugs

Regulatory and Institutional Efforts

WHO (2023)

Issued updated safety alerts following a cluster of fatal TXA intrathecal administrations in low-resource settings.

FDA (2022)

Reinforced the use of Name Simulation Studies as a regulatory step before drug approval, aimed at preventing new LASA names from entering the market

ISMP (2021-2023)

Maintains publishing and updating LASA watch lists, near-miss reports, and instructions for reorganizing medicine storage and ampoule labeling.

JCI’s Role in LASA Error Prevention

The Joint Commission International (JCI) is a globally recognized healthcare accreditation body that sets rigorous standards for patient safety and quality of care. It supports hospitals and health systems worldwide in improving clinical practices, including medication safety and LASA error prevention.

International Patient Safety Goals (IPSG 3) included standard practice to improve the safety of high-alert medications under this goal; JCI specifically emphasizes the identification and management of LASA medications.

Accredited hospitals are required to maintain an active list of LASA drugs, assess risk potential, and implement preventive strategies such as the following:

  • Tall Man lettering
  • Color-coded labels
  • Separate storage
  • Staff education and the LASA drill

JCI mandates that organizations implement Medication Management and Use (MMU) protocols, which include:

  • A documented LASA risk reduction strategy
  • Use of double-verification systems in dispensing and administration
  • Periodic audits and incident tracking of LASA errors

JCI provides toolkits and reference guidelines for identifying LASA pairs during formulary reviews and encourages the use of international LASA watch lists

Conclusion

One of the biggest risks to patient safety is still LASA medication errors, particularly in high-stakes settings like critical care, oncology, and surgery. These errors could be reduced by combining smart storage systems, training, modern technologies, and regulatory reform.

The key lies in redundancy: no single tool or strategy is enough. Systems need to be built to fail safely, identifying mistakes before they affect the patient. We can eliminate LASA errors with the correct tool investment and attention to detail.

References

Bryan R, Aronson JK, Williams AJ, Jordan S. A systematic literature review of LASA error interventions. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2020 Nov 16; 87(2):336–51.

Samuel RO, Adonicam V, Mgaya AH, Accidental intrathecal tranexamic acid injection during cesarean section: A case report. Case Reports in Anesthesiology, 2024 Jan 1; 2024(1).

Harby SA, Kohaf NA. Accidental intrathecal injection of tranexamic acid: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2023 Feb 16; 17(1).

Hydralazine, Hydroxyzine Confused Again, America’s PHARMACIST | October 2016, Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), https://www.ncpa.co/issues/APOCT16-MedSafety.pdf

Hydroxyzine and Hydralazine Mix-Ups, Pennsylvania Patient Safety Advisory, Patient Safety Authority, https://patientsafety.pa.gov/ADVISORIES/Pages/200606_21.aspx

Ryan AN, Robertson KL, Glass BD. Look-Alike, Sound-Alike Medication Perioperative Incidents in a Regional Australian Hospital: Assessment using a Novel Medication Safety Culture Assessment Tool. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2025 Mar 3;

Neelakantan M, Association for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India, Department of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India, Independent Economist, India. Look-alike, sound-alike (LASA) drugs in India. Vol. 26, the Lancet Regional Health – Southeast Asia, 2024, p. 100425

Wikipedia contributors, Tall Man lettering, Wikipedia, 2024

Nguyen TT, Nguyen HD, Nguyen TH, Pham HH, Ide I, Nguyen PL, A Novel Approach for Pill-Prescription Matching with GNN Assistance and Contrastive Learning, arXiv.org. 2022

Acute care, ECRI, and ISMP, 2024

Meyer TA, McAllister RK. Medication Errors Related to Look-Alike, Sound-Alike Drugs—How Big is the Problem and What Progress is Being Made? Vol. 38, APSF Newsletter. 2023 p. 2–49

WHO. (2023). Intrathecal TXA Global Alert

Office of the Commissioner, Modeling & Simulation at FDA [Internet], U.S. Food And Drug Administration. 2022.

Dhande PP, Mule AV, Chaudhari AP. Retrospective analysis of look-alike and sound-alike drug incidents in a tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2021 Apr 15;14(2):114–7.

Standards Interpretation FAQs, IPSG-3, Joint Commission International, https://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/-/media/jci/jci-documents/contact-us/submit-a-jci-standards-interpretation-question/jci_standards_interpretation_faqs.pdf

Multiple Reports of Confusion Between Lamotrigine (LAMICTAL®) and Products with ‘sound alike’ / ‘look alike’ Names, ISMP Canada Safety Bulletin, ISMP Canada, December 2001, Vol 1, Issue 3

Dr. Srivatsan Suresh is a Pharm.D. graduate with a focused background in clinical research, pharmacovigilance, and regulatory science. Adept at synthesizing clinical data into clear, compliant medical content. Passionate about medical writing as a strategic tool to support regulatory submissions, healthcare communication, and scientific publications in a fast-paced industry setting.

TKR_11zon

How Robotic Technology is Transforming Knee Replacement Surgery

01 July 2025

Category: Surgical Technology I Robotic Surgery I

Robotic Knee Surgery

 

Medically Reviewed By: Dr. Dinesh Patil (MBBS, D-Ortho)

Knee and Hip Arthroplasty specialist surgeon

Assisted By: Dewanshee Ingale

TKR_11zon
ciocenter.com

Knee replacement surgery has made significant progress in the past few years, offering relief and flexibility to the majority of people who suffer from serious joint pain and arthritis. The integration of robotic technology has made advancements in joint replacement, especially knee surgery, to new heights of precision and efficacy. Robotic-assisted knee replacement surgery has transformed the way orthopaedic surgeries are performed, providing numerous benefits to patients and orthopaedic surgeons.

What is Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement Surgery

Robot-assisted knee replacement surgery is a new method that uses the most advanced robotic technology and the expertise of an experienced orthopedic surgeon. The robots used in this procedure are either fully automated or semi-automated. It is an extremely refined device that helps the surgeon. The use of robotic technology offers immediate feedback, enhanced visualization, and precise control, which permits the surgeon to position and align the knee implant more precisely than with conventional methodologies.

Surgeons either use a CT scan-driven 3D model of the patient’s knee joint or use an X-ray and their own experience to mark anatomical landmarks. By using either plan, the orthopedic surgeon creates an individualized surgical plan to adapt to the unique anatomy of each patient. The robotic arm simply directs the surgeon’s movements, making sure the bone cuts and implant positioning are implemented with submillimeter accuracy. The systems also allow for enabling adjustments as needed and real-time feedback for optimal results.

With the use of the integration of robotic technology with the experience of excellent orthopedic surgeons, the margin of error, trauma associated with the adjacent tissues are minimized, and it is easy to create a personalized approach for each patient. Resulting in safer, more convenient, and more reliable knee replacement with the ability to recover fast and serve for long-term benefits. 

CT Scan-Guided vs Non-CT Scan-Guided Knee Replacement

As advancements in knee replacement surgical techniques evolve, a key distinction has emerged in how these surgeries are planned and executed, like CT scan-guided versus non-CT scan-guided approaches. Each method has its advantages and limitations, and the choice generally depends on the patient’s condition, the surgeon’s expertise, and available resources.

CT scan-guided or image-based knee replacement involves preoperative 3D imaging, usually using a computed tomography (CT) scan. This scan helps generate a patient-specific surgical plan, customized to the individual’s bone anatomy and alignment. In CT scan-guided knee replacement, a detailed scan of the knee is used to create a 3D model of the patient’s knee anatomy. This model helps the surgeon to plan the surgery with high precision by selecting the optimal implant size, position, and alignment. In many cases, custom surgical tools or cutting guides are also 3D-printed based on this data to ensure a perfect fit.

Non-CT scan-guided knee replacement surgery relies on standard X-rays, manual instruments, and the surgeon’s understanding of anatomical landmarks, without the use of preoperative 3D imaging. This traditional approach has been widely used for decades and continues to deliver excellent clinical outcomes in a broad range of patients. It is cost-effective, readily available in most hospitals, and does not expose patients to additional radiation. While it may involve more intraoperative judgment and variability in implant positioning, experienced surgeons can achieve highly successful and durable results using this method.

Fully Automated vs Semi-Automated Knee Replacement Procedures

Depending on the level of technological integration, these procedures can be categorized into fully automated and semi-automated systems, each with its degree of precision, control, and surgeon involvement.

Fully automated systems refer to highly advanced robotic platforms capable of executing surgical tasks with minimal manual intervention. These systems use preoperative imaging (such as CT or MRI scans) to generate a precise 3D model of the patient’s knee, and then autonomously guide or perform steps like bone cutting and implant positioning based on the surgical plan.

Semi-automated procedures are the current standard in robotic-assisted knee replacements. In these surgeries, the robot acts as a guide or assistant, helping the surgeon perform tasks more accurately rather than executing them independently. Semi-automated knee replacement combines real-time navigation with robotic guidance to enhance surgical precision. The surgeon remains in full control, using robotic assistance based on preoperative or intraoperative imaging (CT or imageless systems).

How Does Robotic-Assisted Knee Surgery Work

Preoperative Planning

The process of the knee replacement starts with complete imaging, which involves conducting CT scans or X-rays, which helps the robotic technology to create a detailed and personalized 3D model of the patient’s knee. The obtained 3D model is beneficial for the surgeon to plan a systematic plan for mapping out the precise bone-cutting procedure and implant positioning and its size according to the patient’s distinctive anatomy.

Surgical Guidance

During the surgery, the patient is anesthetized, and to access the knee joint, a small incision is made. The robotic system is then established and synced with the preoperative 3D model. As the surgeon proceeds with the surgery, the robotic arm offers real-time feedback and suggestions to make sure every minute action aligns with the developed surgical plan. The system observes and maintains a proper alignment according to the plan, aids in making accurate bone cuts, and evaluates the soft tissue balance during the procedure.

Enhanced Accuracy

The data-driven approach of the robotic system allows for highly precise placement of the knee implant, enhancing the fitting and the function of the prosthetic joint. The level of precision minimizes the risk of complications, including implant misalignment or asymmetric wear, and results in the easy, quick, and smooth recovery of the patients.

Benefits of Robotic-Assisted Knee Surgery

Persistent-Knee-Pain-Raja-Hospital
rajahospitals.com

Proven Precision and Customisation

The robotic-assisted knee replacement uses high-tech imaging and computerized systems to create a 3D image of the knee. And thus patients can plan and implement performing the surgery with submillimeter precision, adapting the position of the implant to the patient’s distinctive anatomy. The research has developed a robotic technology to enhance the correctness of implant orientation, which enhances the long-term results and aids in longer implant life and faster recovery of the patients, and leads to increased patient acceptability.

Reduced Recovery Time

The robotic-assisted knee replacement surgery usually needs minor incisions and leads to reduced trauma to the adjacent tissues. The robotic technology provides a correctness that offers improved soft tissue management. This characteristic of the system helps in better patient tolerability due to the decreased postsurgical ache and discomfort, decreases the blood loss, and also reduces the hospital stay. Hence, it offers patients the chance to start recovery and return to the daily routine a lot faster than a patient who was conventionally operated on.

Increased Patient Satisfaction

Multiple surveys and patient studies were conducted with those undergoing the robotic-assisted knee replacement, which reported increased satisfaction rates. This technology supports improved joint function, reduced aches, and a faster and very easy recovery.

Enhanced Safety and Reduced Complications

The robotic-assisted technology offers up-to-date data and assistance in surgery. Reducing the complications associated with the surgery, such as wrong implant placement or unnecessary bone degradation. The integrated robotic technology lowers the risk of complications and problems associated with surgeries like infection, blood loss, and the need for revision surgery. Consequently, this technology offers overall safety of patient.

Clinical Applications and Case Studies

Malla Reddy Narayana Hospital saw 4-5 successful robotic knee replacement surgeries within weeks of implementing the technology, resulting in less soft tissue damage and early mobilization. On a larger scale, Narayana Health City performed 300 robotic knee replacements over six months, treating patients across 31 Indian districts and 10 other countries. 

Challenges and Considerations

Robotic systems are known to show improved results, for which there must be exclusive training in surgeries and maintaining procedural proficiency. Malla Reddy Narayana Hospital has counteracted this via several simulated surgeries and compliance with the international safety protocol. Cost remains a challenge, but institutions are continually making efforts to enhance it through scalable infrastructure.

The Patient Experience

aimsindia.com

Robotic-assisted knee operation redefines the patient’s journey, allowing smoother and easier recovery comparable to the conventional procedure, hence aiding patients in readily accepting surgery. The surgery is usually done under the effect of anesthesia, which may be general or local, making sure that the patients don’t suffer from pain and feel relaxed throughout the operation. 

Hospital stay is the most important factor that makes a patient rethink undergoing surgery, and hence, patients prefer robotic-assisted knee replacement. The most remarkable advantage of this advanced technique is the decreased hospital stay. The majority of people return home in a single day or two post-surgery because of the minor cuts performed during the operation. Same-day discharge is also possible in cases with less complexity and healthy individuals, hence permitting patients to begin recovering at their own homes.

The notable characteristic of robot-assisted surgeries is that patients experience minimal pain and fear because of the minor incisions and correct technique used, which remarkably improves recovery. This methodology supports quick mobilization, with many patients who are able to stand and start walking with support within hours after the surgery.

The patient is started on physiotherapy after the surgery, mostly on the same day or the next morning. Immediate recovery is very important for the restoration of joint movement, fostering strength, and helping with a rapid shift to daily routine. The mixture of reduced postsurgical pain, faster movement, and quick physiotherapy offers a high level of patient satisfaction.

In general, the patient experience is characterized by less pain associated with the joint, fear, and shorter hospital stays, which makes robotic-assisted technology knee replacement a preferred choice in orthopedic patients.

Future Directions

The primary focus of the robotic-assisted knee replacement is fostering customized, efficient, and easily accessible care. One of the significant advancements is the development of custom implant libraries, permitting the surgeons to choose implants as per the unique anatomy of the patient’s knee. Hence, it leads to improved fit and function. The most important development is the combination of predictive analytics with the use of data and artificial intelligence; surgeons are able to predict results and hence personalize recovery plans, leading to faster and more effective recovery. Finally, the ongoing cost reduction measures focus on making the robotic-assisted operations affordable. With the advancing technology and increasing applications, these efforts will continue to make robotic surgery open to a larger number of patients and healthcare organizations. Altogether, these trends are coming together to create a future in which the robotic knee replacement is safer, more accurate, and available to all.

References

Advances in Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement Surgery https://www.narayanahealth.org/blog/robotic-orthopaedic-surgery

Saber AY, Marappa-Ganeshan R, Mabrouk A. Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty. [Updated 2023 Aug 14]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564396/

Robotic Knee Replacement Surgery: Types, Procedure, Technology, Benefits, and Risks https://poonahospital.org/blog/robotic-knee-replacement-surgery/

Mobility Matters: Narayan Health City Performs 300 Robotic Knee Replacements in Six Months https://www.healthcareexecutive.in/blog/mobility-matters

Fu X, She Y, Jin G, Liu C, Liu Z, Li W, Jin R. Comparison of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 25;18(1):292. Doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02045-y. PMID: 39052153; PMCID: PMC11272701.

Aneja K, Rudraraju RT, Shyam A. Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Innovations, Precision, and the Future of Joint Reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 2024 December;14(12): 04-07.

Advances in Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement Surgery https://www.narayanahealth.org/blog/advances-in-robotic-assisted-knee-replacement-surgery

Mancino F, Fontalis A, Kayani B, Magan A, Plastow R, Haddad FS. The current role of CT in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2024 Sep 1;106-B(9):892-897. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B9.BJJ-2023-1303.R1. PMID: 39216858.

Robotic Knee Replacement: Advantages and Disadvantages, Care CHL Hospital, https://www.carehospitals.com/indore/blog-detail/general/robotic-knee-replacement

wegovy vs mounjaro

Wegovy vs. Mounjaro: A Head-On Comparison at the Dawn of Wegovy’s Launch in India

30 June 2025

Category:  Pharmaceutical Market Analysis I Drug Comparison & Reviews I

Obesity Therapeutics 

Written by:

Priyanka Khamkar, MPharm, and

Vikas Londhe, MPharm

Reviewed By:

Pharmacally Editorial Team

ChatGPT Image Jun 30, 2025, 12_08_20 PM

Wegovy (Semaglutide), the widely acclaimed GLP-1 agonist for weight loss, has officially launched in India by Danish pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk, following its overseas success. Wegovy’s launch has set the stage for a direct face-off with Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro (Tirzepatide), which entered the Indian market just three months earlier.

India is now home to the second-largest number of adults living with diabetes; obesity is also on the rise due to interdependent metabolic pathways, poor dietary habits, and increasingly sedentary urban lifestyles. Earlier in India, obesity was considered to be a lifestyle issue, and spending money on anti-obesity drugs was never on the priority list. But as the awareness about obesity and its associated health conditions is increased due to social media, physician counseling, the rise of nutritional health experts, and increased link of obesity with other ailments, it is now being recognized as a chronic, relapsing disease with serious health consequences, including cardiovascular disease, type-2 diabetes, and certain cancers.

Mounjaro, launched earlier this year in March, has already gained a foothold due to its superior weight loss efficacy (up to 23%) and promising results in both diabetes and obesity treatment. In contrast, Wegovy, which got approval in June 2025, has earned widespread global recognition for its effectiveness in achieving 15–20% weight loss and its cardiovascular benefits.

Wegovy is now available in major Indian cities, offering a new option for patients struggling with obesity and its associated health burdens. Its entry indicated not just another medicine option apart from Mounjaro, but a broader shift in India’s healthcare arena, where obesity is finally being addressed with serious medical intervention.

Drug Profiles & Mechanisms

Wegovy (semaglutide)

  • Type: Once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist
  • Mechanism of Action: Mimics glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), a natural satiety hormone. It reduces appetite, slows gastric emptying, and enhances insulin secretion, leading to reduced calorie intake and improved metabolic control.
  • Approved Indications: Approved in India as the first obesity-specific medication with a clear indication for chronic weight management
  • Also approved for cardiovascular risk reduction in overweight/obese individuals with established heart disease (based on the the SELECT trial).
  • Clinical Trials & Efficacy: STEP trials (Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity): Demonstrated average weight loss of 15%, with some patients reaching up to 20% at higher doses.
  • Indian data indicates that 1 in 3 patients may achieve 20% weight loss with consistent high-dose use.

Mounjaro (Tirzepatide)

  • Type: Once-weekly dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist
  • Mechanism of Action: Acts on both glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and GLP-1 receptors, offering synergistic metabolic effects. It improves insulin sensitivity, reduces appetite, enhances satiety, and facilitates significant fat loss.
  • Approved Indications: Initially approved in India for type 2 diabetes, now also approved for chronic weight management. In June 2025, India approved the Mounjaro KwikPen covering full doses (2.5–15 mg) for easier self-administration.
  • Clinical Trials & Efficacy: SURMOUNT trials, particularly SURMOUNT-1 and SURMOUNT-5, showed average weight loss of 20–22.5%, outperforming semaglutide in head-to-head comparisons.
  • Recognized for offering one of the highest weight reductions ever seen in obesity pharmacotherapy.

Launch Timeline 

  • Mounjaro launched in India in March 2025 via vials.
  • Mounjaro KwikPen launched in June 2025.
  • Wegovy launched on June 24, 2025

Dosage and Delivery Availability

 

Features

Wegovy Prefilled Pen

Mounjaro Vial

Mounjaro KwikPen (Approved in June 2025)

Device Type

FlexPen (prefilled, single-use pen)

Vial for manual injection

KwikPen (prefilled, auto-injector)

Dose Range

0.25 mg – 2.4 mg

2.5 mg – 5 mg

2.5 mg – 15 mg

Dosing Frequency

Once Weekly

Once Weekly

Once Weekly

Wegovy is available in 5 different doses ranging from 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.7 mg, and 2.4 mg. It is available as a single-use FlexPen covering all step-up doses (0.25 mg to 2.4 mg), administered once a week.

The Mounjaro vial provides limited dose options available in two doses, 2.5 mg and 5 mg, which require manual preparation before injection.

Mounjaro, recently approved as a prefilled auto-injector in June 2025, named Mounjaro KwikPen, expands the dosing range up to 15 mg, enabling more convenient and auto-injector-based delivery, administered once weekly.

Pricing of Wegovy

Dose

Per Dose Pricing

Monthly Pricing

0.25mg

Rs. 4366

Rs. 17345

0.5mg

Rs. 4366

Rs. 17345

1.0mg

Rs. 4366

Rs. 17345

1.7mg

Rs. 6070

Rs. 24280

2.4mg

Rs. 6503

Rs. 26015

Pricing of Mounjaro

Dose

Per-Dose Pricing

Monthly Pricing

2.5 mg

Rs. 3500

Rs. 14000

5.0 mg

Rs. 4375

Rs. 17500

Wegovy (semaglutide) is priced uniformly at ₹4,366 per dose for the initial lower doses (0.25 mg to 1.0 mg), with prices increasing for higher doses: 1.7 mg: ₹6,070 per dose (₹24,280/month); 2.4 mg (maintenance dose): ₹6,503 per dose (₹26,015/month)

Mounjaro (Tirzepatide) is more cost-effective in comparison: 2.5 mg (starter dose): ₹3,500 per dose (₹14,000/month); 5.0 mg (maintenance dose): ₹4,375 per dose (₹17,500/month)

Mounjaro offers a significantly more affordable monthly treatment, up to ₹8,500 less per month at maintenance doses, making it a cost-attractive option in India’s growing anti-obesity drug market. However, Wegovy is looking more expensive as compared to Mounjaro, but it is backed by robust global clinical trial data and proven long-term efficacy.

Market Growth and Patient Response

As Mounjaro is having a first-mover advantage, as it is launched in March 2025, it shows explosive growth in its first three months of sales. According to Business Today, data from March to May reveals a steady month-on-month increase in both value and volume sales. Revenue grew from ₹3.46 crore in March to ₹7.87 crore in April and ₹12.60 crore in May, with a cumulative total of ₹23.94 crore over three months. Similarly, unit sales increased from 11,640 units in March to 27,650 in April and further to 42,280 in May, bringing the total to over 81,000 units sold during this period. These figures reflect a strong ascending trend in physician prescribing and patient onboarding since the drug’s market entry in March.

Wegovy, which has now entered the Indian market, is expected to benefit from the same rising demand seen with Mounjaro. Previously, Wegovy faced global supply issues with limited production and distribution due to high demand worldwide. However, those supply problems have now mostly been resolved, specifically for the Indian market, allowing a more stable and consistent availability of the drug in India. This positions Wegovy to compete effectively and meet growing patient needs without the delays or shortages experienced earlier in other countries.

Market Size & Growth

As per the report of HORIZON Grand View Research, India’s anti-obesity medication market is ready for explosive growth. In 2023, the market generated revenue of approximately ₹1,525 crore (USD 183.4 million), and it is projected to reach around ₹21,790 crore (USD 2,619 million) by 2030. This growth represents an impressive compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 46.2% from 2024 to 2030. The market surge is typically due to rising obesity rates, increasing awareness of related health risks, and a growing demand for effective medical treatments like Mounjaro and Wegovy. As medicine availability and accessibility improve and physician adoption increases, India is emerging as a major market for next-generation weight-loss therapies.

Strategic Battle: Wegovy vs Mounjaro in India

First-Mover Advantage

Eli Lilly gained an early lead by launching Mounjaro in March 2024, capturing physician attention and onboarding patients first. In response, Novo Nordisk quickly launches Wegovy, aiming to exploit the same momentum and not lose market share.

Device Convenience: Pens over Vials

Both companies now use pen devices instead of vials, which are more user-friendly, improve patient adherence, and support easy self-injection.

 Efficacy Advantage

In clinical trials, Mounjaro (tirzepatide) showed up to ~23% weight loss, and Wegovy (semaglutide) showed 15–20% weight loss. This superior efficacy profile could tilt the market in favour of Mounjaro, especially for patients seeking maximum weight loss results.

 Patent Expiry and Generic Entry

Wegovy (semaglutide) will lose patent protection in India by March 2026, opening the door for low-cost generics, potentially 60–90% cheaper

In contrast, Mounjaro (tirzepatide) remains patent-protected until around 2036, giving Lilly a longer pricing runway and protection from generic competition.

Final Take

India’s anti-obesity drug market is undergoing a crucial shift. Historically, obesity was not recognized as a medical condition in the country, and as a result, anti-obesity medications were often seen as non-essential or lifestyle products. Many patients were unwilling to invest in prescription-based weight loss treatments. However, for the first time, India is witnessing a competitive fight between two global pharmaceutical giants, Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, as they strive for dominance in this emerging therapeutic space. This competition signals a shift in perception, where obesity is increasingly considered a serious and treatable health condition, opening the door to more scientifically and medically proven weight management.

Elli Lilly’s Mounjaro currently holds a strategic edge with its superior efficacy (~23% weight loss) and longer patent protection until ~2036, making it well-suited for medically supervised, premium patients who prioritize results and can afford higher prices. Its early market entry and KwikPen device covering the full dose range further strengthen its position.

On the other hand, Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy brings a powerful mix of strong global brand equity and proven cardiovascular benefits, making it highly appealing, especially as obesity increasingly intersects with metabolic and heart health. Novo Nordisk’s accelerated India launch shows a clear intent to capture momentum, particularly in urban centers, before generics flood the market post-2026, when semaglutide’s patent expires.

References

Novo Nordisk launches weight-loss drug Wegovy in India to compete with Lilly’s Mounjaro, Reuters, June 24 2025, https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/novo-nordisk-launches-blockuster-weight-loss-drug-wegovy-india-2025-06-24/

Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy debuts in India: How it works, who it’s for, and how much it costs, Times of India, June 27 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/health-fitness/health-news/novo-nordisks-wegovy-debuts-in-india-how-it-works-who-its-for-and-how-much-it-costs/articleshow/122054770.cms

Novo Nordisk launches blockbuster weight-loss drug Wegovy in India; Check price, dosage and other details, The Economics Times, June 24 2025, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/new-updates/novo-nordisk-launches-blockbuster-weight-loss-drug-wegovy-in-india-check-price-dosage-and-other-details/articleshow/122042130.cms?from=mdr

Highlights of prescribing information, Wegovy, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2023/215256s007lbl.pdf

Highlights of prescribing information, Mounjaro, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/215866s000lbl.pdf

Lilly to launch Mounjaro pen in India to compete with Novo’s weight-loss drug Wegovy, Reuters, June 26 2026, https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/lilly-launch-mounjaro-pen-india-compete-with-novos-wegovy-2025-06-26/

Eli Lilly’s Mounjaro hits Rs 24 crore sales in 3 months as adoption grows for diabetes and obesity in India, Business Today, 08 June 2025, https://www.businesstoday.in/industry/pharma/story/eli-lillys-mounjaro-hits-rs-24-crore-sales-in-three-months-as-adoption-grows-for-diabetes-and-obesity-in-india-479483-2025-06-08

Eli Lilly launches weight-loss drug Mounjaro in India, beats Novo Nordisk to major market, March 21 2025, https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/eli-lilly-launches-weight-loss-drug-mounjaro-india-after-drug-regulator-approval-2025-03-20/

India Anti-Obesity Medication Market Size & Outlook, HORIZON Grand View Research, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/anti-obesity-medication-market/india

 

ChatGPT Image Jun 29, 2025, 12_52_04 PM

Wearable Health Technology: Turning Pharmacovigilance from Reactive to Proactive and Predictive

29 June 2025

Category:  Drug Safety | Health Technology |

Digital Health

Written by:

Utkarsha Patil, M.Pharm

Reviewed and Fact-Checked By:

Vikas Londhe, MPharm

ChatGPT Image Jun 29, 2025, 12_52_04 PM
Freepik.com

Pharmacovigilance is the phase of clinical trials that continues throughout the lifespan of the medicine. The main aim of pharmacovigilance is to collect clinical trial and post-marketing information related to the safety of medicine. To collect this information, pharmaceutical industries rely heavily on doctors and patients to voluntarily report safety information, which, unfortunately, often results in underreporting and delayed identification of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Additionally, pharmaceutical industries take proactive steps in the form of different support programs through which they collect safety information, but that requires a lot of effort and increases the economic burden. On the other hand, the major drawback of clinical trials is that they do not provide real-world data, as trials are conducted in a very controlled manner.

In recent times, the popularity of wearable health devices is increasing; for example, smartwatches have almost replaced traditional wristwatches; people love to wear them. These smartwatches track the health data of the person without using any additional devices or any effort. Health data like heart rate, blood pressure, beats, oxygen level, step counts, and daily calories burned etc. have been recorded by Fitbit. These features of health devices are very beneficial in tracking any adverse events in patients, specifically cardiology events.

Hence, the landscape is evolving with the arrival of wearable health technology. Devices like these now facilitate continuous, real-time monitoring of physiological parameters, offering an additional, more proactive, and more comprehensive channel to gather safety information. As per one research published in PLOS Digital Health Journal on wearable devices in digital health, which focused on the main functions of these devices that are monitoring, screening, detection, and prediction, these functions closely resemble the basic principles of pharmacovigilance, i.e., monitoring, detecting, assessing, and understanding adverse events.

Benefits of Wearable Technologies

Wearables are becoming powerful health monitoring tools. As most of the devices work on batteries and are charged and worn throughout the day, they provide comprehensive health data continuously. This ability to continuously collect physiological data could start a new era in pharmacovigilance, where safety information can be observed in real-world settings with accuracy.

Real-Time, Round-the-Clock Monitoring: Wearables operate 24/7, capturing even slight changes in vital signs like irregular heartbeats or sudden blood pressure shifts that might go unnoticed. This allows for quicker identification of potential ADRs compared to traditional reporting methods.

Empowering Patients: These devices give users more control over their health. Patients can easily track their symptoms, receive alerts, and share data with healthcare providers, promoting better communication and medication adherence.

Real-World Evidence (RWE): As mentioned above, unlike controlled clinical trials, wearable data reflects what happens in real life. This helps researchers identify long-term or rare side effects across a broader and more diverse population.

Early Intervention: If a wearable detects warning signs, it can trigger a timely medical review. This allows doctors to adjust dosages, switch medications, or recommend other interventions before issues become serious.

Integration of Wearable Health Technology in Pharmacovigilance

Integration refers to the combination of wearable health devices and artificial intelligence (AI) systems to create a smart, responsive ecosystem that continuously monitors drug safety in real time.

How integration can work step by step

Data Collection from Wearables

Devices such as smartwatches, biosensors, fitness bands, or smart patches collect continuous physiological data, like heart rate changes, sleep cycles, ECG, physical activity, temperature, calorie burn, oxygen levels, glucose, etc.

Real-Time Analysis via AI/ML

These raw data channels are pushed into AI-powered platforms (cloud) that use machine learning algorithms to detect patterns or deviations. This analysis might include filtration of the data, identification of any significant patterns, and generation of actionable insights.

The AI continuously learns from population-level data and individual baselines to distinguish between normal variation and potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Example: If a wearable detects repeated nighttime arrhythmias after a patient starts a new antihypertensive drug, the AI may flag this as a safety signal.

Connection with Digital Therapeutic Apps

Health Device Wearables are typically connected to mobile apps

These apps can:

  • Notify patients of detected abnormalities
  • Mobile apps may ask for symptom confirmation (e.g., “Are you experiencing dizziness or palpitations?”)
  • Prompt them to report side effects
  • Provide customized health advice or reminders

Automated Reporting & Pharmacovigilance Feedback Loops

  • If an ADR is suspected, the platform can generate an automated case report for healthcare providers or regulatory bodies.
  • These systems can be connected to electronic health records (EHRs) or pharmacovigilance databases like the FDA’s FAERS or EMA’s EudraVigilance, improving the speed and accuracy of safety signal detection.

Real-World Applications of Wearable & App Integration in Pharmacovigilance

1. Apple Heart Study—Stanford & Apple (Supported by FDA)

Apple, in collaboration with Stanford University, has conducted a study in approximately 500,000 participants to assess whether the Apple Watch can accurately detect atrial fibrillation (AFib), a potentially serious heart rhythm condition.

  • The Apple Watch continuously monitors users’ heart rhythms.
  • Data was sent to a dedicated app.
  • If an irregular rhythm was detected, users received a notification and were connected to a telemedicine consultation and an ECG patch for clinical confirmation.

This kind of continuous monitoring is now being considered for drug-induced arrhythmias, such as those caused by QT-prolonging medications (e.g., antipsychotics, antibiotics).

2. FDA’s Digital Health Software Precertification Program

Many health startups and companies have developed software that tracks various health-related data of individuals. As a result, this software generally functions similarly to medical devices. To address this, the FDA introduced a program based on the concept of Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). Under this framework, the FDA aims to fast-track the approval of trustworthy software and apps that collect, analyze, and act on health data, including those used for pharmacovigilance purposes.

Under this program, the AI-powered health apps are integrated with wearables (like Fitbit or Garmin) that can detect side effects from drugs (e.g., fatigue, arrhythmia, sleep disruption) to accelerate approval. These systems generate automated alerts to clinicians or researchers.

3. Propeller Health’s Bluetooth-connected Inhaler

Propeller Health (ResMed) focuses on digital respiratory health, particularly for conditions like asthma and COPD. Their system integrates Bluetooth-enabled inhaler sensors with mobile health apps to track medication usage patterns and environmental triggers. By analyzing this real-time data, the platform can detect signs of drug overuse, poor disease control, or adverse effects such as tremors and potential indicators of medication toxicity. This continuous monitoring supports pharmacovigilance efforts by identifying drug misuse, ineffectiveness, and side effects more accurately and contributes valuable safety data to regulatory and clinical databases.

4. Stanford University Studies Using Wearables for Vaccine Safety

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Stanford University partnered with Tel Aviv University to monitor post-vaccine side effects using wearable and mobile apps.

How It Worked:

  • Participants wore smartwatches and logged symptoms via an app.
  • Physiological data like resting heart rate, activity level, and sleep were analyzed for changes after vaccination.
  • Helped detect both expected side effects (like fever) and rare ones.

 This study showed how digital tools can enhance post-market surveillance for vaccines and could apply to drug safety monitoring as well.

5. Ongoing Clinical Trials Using Wearables for Drug Safety

Many current FDA-registered trials use wearables for pharmacovigilance-related outcomes:

  • Trials using continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) to monitor the safety of anti-diabetic drugs.
  • Smart patches monitor vitals in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy to detect early toxicity.

Special Considerations for Older Adults

Wearable technology has proven useful, especially for seniors. For example, it’s been used to detect medication-related changes in movement or behavior, such as excessive sedation or fall risk, offering insights into how drugs affect older populations in daily life.

Challenges of Wearable health technology

Despite its clear application in the healthcare system, including pharmacovigilance and clinical trials, this technology has some limitations that may hinder its true potential to be used in real-life settings; some of them are

  1. 1. Data Accuracy and Validation
  2. Privacy and Data Security Concerns
  3. Integration with Clinical and Regulatory Systems

Conclusion
Wearable health technology has laid the groundwork for a smarter and more responsive approach to drug safety. With the ability to collect real-time, significant data directly from users, these tools are turning pharmacovigilance from a reactive and proactive mode to a predictive mode, where users can predict the adverse event in real time. But to truly unlock their full potential, we must address challenges like privacy protection, device integration, and data reliability. If we work on these aspects, wearable-driven surveillance could reshape drug monitoring into something safer, more efficient, and tailored to individual needs.

Reference

Kalisch Ellett LM, Janetzki JL, Lim R, Laba TL, Pratt NL. Innovations in pharmacovigilance studies of medicines in older people. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jan; 91(1):66-83. Doi: 10.1111/bcp.16049. Epub 2024 Mar 26. PMID: 38529693; PMCID: PMC11671332.

Jiang N, Mück JE, Yetisen AK. The Regulation of Wearable Medical Devices. Trends Biotechnol. 2020 Feb; 38(2):129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jul 15. PMID: 31320119.

Muniappan S, Jeyaraman M, Yadav S, Applications of Blockchain-Based Technology for Healthcare Devices Post-market Surveillance. Cureus. 2024 Apr 8;16(4):e57881. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57881. PMID: 38725738; PMCID: PMC11079575.

Badnjević A, Pokvić LG, Deumić A, Bećirović LS. Post-market surveillance of medical devices: A review. Technol Health Care. 2022;30(6):1315-1329. Doi: 10.3233/THC-220284. PMID: 35964220.

Canali S, Schiaffonati V, Aliverti A (2022) Challenges and recommendations for wearable devices in digital health: Data quality, interoperability, health equity, fairness. PLOS Digit Health 1(10): e0000104. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pdig.0000104

Wearable Technology in Healthcare: Types, Benefits, and Future of Medical Devices, topflight, https://topflightapps.com/ideas/wearable-technology-in-healthcare/

Kang HS, Exworthy M. Wearing the Future—Wearables to Empower Users to Take Greater Responsibility for Their Health and Care: Scoping Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jul 13;10(7):e35684. doi: 10.2196/35684. PMID: 35830222; PMCID: PMC9330198.

Real-time Analytics and Interoperability in Wearable Health Technology: Revolutionizing Patient Care, ACL digital, https://www.acldigital.com/blogs/real-time-analytics-and-interoperability-wearable-health-technology-revolutionizing-patient

Perez MV, Large-Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation, The New England Journal of Medicine, N Engl J Med 2019;381:1909-1917 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901183

Apple Heart Study, Stanford Medicine, https://med.stanford.edu/appleheartstudy.html

Stanford Medicine announces results of unprecedented Apple Heart Study, https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/03/stanford-medicine-announces-results-of-unprecedented-apple-heart-study/

The Software Precertification (Pre-Cert) Pilot Program: Tailored Total Product Lifecycle Approaches and Key Findings, Sep 2022, US FDA, https://www.fda.gov/media/161815/download

Asthma patients breathe easier with new Bluetooth inhalers, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/asthma-patients-breathe-easier-new-bluetooth-inhalers

Chan AHY, Pleasants et al, Digital Inhalers for Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Scientific Perspective. Pulm Ther. 2021 Dec;7(2):345-376. DOI: 10.1007/s41030-021-00167-4. Epub 2021 Aug 11. PMID: 34379316; PMCID: PMC8589868.

Guan G, Mofaz M, Qian G, Patalon T, Shmueli E, Yamin D, Brandeau ML. Higher sensitivity monitoring of reactions to COVID-19 vaccination using smartwatches. NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Sep 9;5(1):140. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00683-w. PMID: 36085312; PMCID: PMC9461410.